Legal Opinion

Graham v. Hunt

California Court of Appeal

Decided January 12, 1932No. Docket No. 8149PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WARD, J., pro tem.

This is an appeal by defendants from a judgment quieting title of plaintiffs to certain property in Los Angeles County. The complaint is in the form ordinarily used in quiet title actions. The answer sets up a claim based upon a judgment in the sum of $6,090.12 with interest and costs rendered in an action wherein the present plaintiffs were defendants and the present defendants were plaintiffs. The answer further sets forth that on the eighth day of September, 1927, the judgment was duly entered and an abstract of such judgment recorded on the thirteenth day of September,…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Faxon v. All PersonsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Lubbock v. McMannCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
  3. Lean v. GivensCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Hulse v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  5. Marelli v. KeatingCalifornia Supreme Court · 1929

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Viotti v. GiomiCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1964
  2. Lucci v. United Credit and Collection Co.California Supreme Court · 1934
  3. McMorris v. PaganoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1944
  4. Coca Cola Bottling Co. v. FelicianoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  5. Emile v. Van BeverCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API