Legal Opinion

Hulse v. Davis

California Supreme Court

Decided January 31, 1927No. Docket No. L.A. 9522PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

THE COURT.

Application for a writ of supersedeas. The applicant herein instituted an action against the above-named respondents on July 19, 1915, in the superior court of the county of Los Angeles. Judgment was entered in said action in favor of the applicant on January 28, 1916. On May 10, 1916, execution issued upon said judgment and was thereafter returned partly satisfied. No further proceedings were had or taken in the action until September 3, 1926, at which time, on an ex parte motion of counsel for the applicant and apparently without prior notice thereof having been given to the…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Dulin v. Pacific Wood & Coal Co.California Supreme Court · 1893
  2. Imperial Water Co. No. 3 v. HallCalifornia Supreme Court · 1926
  3. Tyler v. PresleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887
  4. In re TylerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1886
  5. Wellington v. SedgwickCalifornia Supreme Court · 1859

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Baum v. BaumCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  2. Dabney v. PhilleoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1951
  3. People Ex Rel. Boarts v. City of WestmorelandCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
  4. Stewart v. HurtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
  5. Deepwell Homeowners'protective Assn. v. City Council of City of Palm SpringsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1965

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API