Legal Opinion

City of Yakima v. Snively

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1926No. 19637. En BancPublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtHolcomb, J.

— This action was brought to foreclose a lien for special assessments, and from a decree in favor of respondent city and respondent intervener, this appeal is taken.

On February 20, 1911, a resolution of intention to improve certain streets in Yakima, was adopted by the city council, the improvement district being designated as No. 224. On March 8,1911, an ordinance was passed, in conformity with the resolution of intention, providing for the improvement to consist of paving certain streets and avenues, including, among others, one designated therein as Linden Lane, and another then called…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. City of Palmetto v. KatschSupreme Court of Florida · 1923
  2. Lewis v. City of SeattleWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  3. State ex rel. Latimer v. HenryWashington Supreme Court · 1902
  4. Kuehl v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Murphy v. SummersettWashington Supreme Court · 1915

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentWashington Supreme Court · 2005
  2. Rosenthal v. City of TacomaWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  3. Patchell v. City of PuyallupCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1984
  4. Port of Peninsula v. BendiksenWashington Supreme Court · 1967
  5. City of Yakima v. SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1927

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API