Legal Opinion

Patchell v. City of Puyallup

Court of Appeals of Washington

Decided April 30, 1984No. 5485-0-IIPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPetrich, C.J.

Having reconsidered our prior opinion, filed January 14, 1982, as directed by a notation order of the Supreme Court which remanded the case for further consideration in light of Fisher Bros. Corp. v. Des Moines Sewer Dist., 97 Wn.2d 227, 643 P.2d 436 (1982), our prior opinion is withdrawn and the following is substituted.

This appeal deals with the degree of compliance with statutory procedures required to invoke the court's jurisdiction under Const. art. 4, § 6 (amend. 65) to review local improvement district assessments and the inherent or equity power of the court to review such assessments…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Londoner v. City and County of DenverSupreme Court of the United States · 1908
  2. In Re the Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus of SantoreCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1981
  3. Stasher v. Harger-HaldemanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962
  4. In Re SaltisWashington Supreme Court · 1980
  5. Fisher Bros. Corp. v. Des Moines Sewer Dist.Washington Supreme Court · 1982

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Little Deli Marts, Inc. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  2. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  3. Tiffany Family Trust Corp. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2003
  4. Little Deli Marts, Inc. v. City of KentCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
  5. First Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. City of West RichlandCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1985

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API