Legal Opinion

Port of Peninsula v. Bendiksen

Washington Supreme Court

Decided June 29, 1967No. 38633PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDonworth, J.

This action was commenced by appellant, Port of Peninsula, to recover certain sums allegedly owed it by respondents as a result of respondents’ use of a tidal basin, waterway, dock and trestle, and related facilities which are owned by appellant; for services rendered by appellant to the vessel Einer B, owned by respondents; and for respondents’ use of three anchored moorages in the tidal basin, which are owned by appellant. Respondents agreed to payment of the charges based on services to the Einer B, and their use of the anchored moorages belonging to appellant, but denied liability for the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Chandler v. Washington Toll Bridge AuthorityWashington Supreme Court · 1943
  2. Roehl v. Public Utility District No. 1Washington Supreme Court · 1953
  3. Allen v. City of SpokaneWashington Supreme Court · 1919
  4. City of Yakima v. SnivelyWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Edmonds Land Co. v. City of EdmondsWashington Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Parente v. DayOhio Court of Appeals · 1968
  2. Trimen Development Co. v. King CountyCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API