Legal Opinion
Tung Nguyen v. AK Steel Corp.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided August 25, 2010No. Civil Action 08-1320PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
LENIHAN, United States Magistrate Judge.
Currently before the Court for disposition is Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 56 and Western District of Pennsylvania Local Rule 56.1 (Doc. No. 20). In this employment discrimination case, Plaintiff, Tung Nguyen, asserts he was terminated based on national origin discrimination, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq., 42 U.S.C. § 1981, and the Pennsylvania Human Relations Act (“PHRA”), 48 Pa. Stat. § 951 et seq., by his former employer, AK Steel…
2Cases cited49 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Matsushita Electric Industrial Co., Ltd. v. Zenith Radio CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
44 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- BIELICH v. Johnson & Johnson, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Mitchell v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Hodczak v. Latrobe Specialty Steel Co.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2010
- ALI v. HILLSTONE RESTAURANT GROUPDistrict Court, D. New Jersey · 2022
- Cho v. Rosato PereaDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.