Legal Opinion
Hodczak v. Latrobe Specialty Steel Co.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania
Decided December 29, 2010No. Civil Action 08-649PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
McVERRY, District Judge.
Plaintiffs, Douglas M. Hodczak (“Hodczak”), James M. Crossan (“Crossan”), Thomas J. Magdic (“Magdic”) and Joseph A. Litvik (“Litvik”) (collectively, “plaintiffs”), commenced this action under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), as amended, 29 U.S.C. §§ 621 et seq., alleging that defendant Latrobe Specialty Steel Company (“LSS”), discriminated against them because of their age when it terminated their employment in November of 2007, and not, as LSS contends, for sending sexually explicit emails in violation of LSS’ Electronic…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
- Price Waterhouse v. HopkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Gross v. FBL Financial Services, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2009
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Parrotta v. Peco Energy Co.District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2019
- Kovach v. Turner Dairy Farms, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Mitchell v. City of PittsburghDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
- Murphy v. Center for Emergency Medicine of Western Pennsylvania, Inc.District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2013
- Royster v. Laurel Highlands School DistrictDistrict Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2014
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.