Squibb v. Squibb
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.
The parties, while husband and wife, acquired title to certain joint tenancy property; thereafter the wife sued for a divorce and a final decree was entered October 28, 1957. Neither the interlocutory nor the final decree made disposition of the use or ownership of the property. (Fox v. Fox, 18 Cal.2d 645 [117 P.2d 325].) It constitutes a residence wherein the parties lived during their marriage; the wife and the children continued to reside on the premises. The property is encumbered and, as a practical matter, is incapable of physical partition.
Almost, two years after the entry of the final…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
- Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
- In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
- Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
- Amin v. KhazindarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
- Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
- Blackburn v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
- In Re HsiaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.