Legal Opinion

Squibb v. Squibb

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 3, 1961No. Civ. 25122PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtLillie, J.

The parties, while husband and wife, acquired title to certain joint tenancy property; thereafter the wife sued for a divorce and a final decree was entered October 28, 1957. Neither the interlocutory nor the final decree made disposition of the use or ownership of the property. (Fox v. Fox, 18 Cal.2d 645 [117 P.2d 325].) It constitutes a residence wherein the parties lived during their marriage; the wife and the children continued to reside on the premises. The property is encumbered and, as a practical matter, is incapable of physical partition.

Almost, two years after the entry of the final…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Brooks v. HydeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1869
  2. Swan v. WaldenCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. In Re the Estate of FathCalifornia Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Strangman v. DukeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
  5. Fox v. FoxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Schoenfeld v. NorbergCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1970
  2. Amin v. KhazindarCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2003
  3. Lawrence v. HarveyMontana Supreme Court · 1980
  4. Blackburn v. DrakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1963
  5. In Re HsiaDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1995

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API