Legal Opinion
County of Inyo v. Yorty
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 5, 1973No. Civ. 13886PublishedCited by 81 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
RICHARDSON, P. J.
Petitioner (hereinafter “County”) sought a writ of supersedeas which we treated as a petition for writ of mandate, and thereupon issued an alternative writ. Respondents filed appropriate reply to the petition and have also in the trial court .interposed their demurrer and answer.
These proceedings follow the filing of a complaint by County in the County of Inyo against respondent City of Los Angeles, a municipal corporation, its department of water and power, the president and secretary of the department and commission, its chief engineer who is also general manager,…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Friends of Mammoth v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Arlington Coalition on Transportation v. John A. Volpe, Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1972
- Environmental Defense Fund v. Tennessee Valley AuthorityCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1972
- In Re HainesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1925
- Newport v. HattonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by81 opinions
- Laurel Heights Improvement Ass'n of San Francisco, Inc. v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Davis, a Municipal Corporation v. William T. Coleman, Jr., Secretary of TransportationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- No Oil, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- Citizens of Goleta Valley v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Wildlife Alive v. ChickeringCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
76 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.