Legal Opinion

Duke v. Graham

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 30, 2007No. 20051036PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PARRISH, Justice:

INTRODUCTION

{1 The principal question presented by this appeal is whether a member or manager of a limited liability company may be removed through binding arbitration. We answer the question in the affirmative. Although Utah Code sections 48-2e-710(8) and 48-2e-809(1) provide for judicial removal of members and managers of limited liability companies, the legislature did not forbid removal through other means. Additionally, even though the Utah Constitution guarantees Utah citizens their day in court, it does not prevent individuals from bargaining away their rights to…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. State v. HolgateUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  2. Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen v. Central of Georgia Railway CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
  3. State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. State v. PinderUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  5. Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Anderson v. BellUtah Supreme Court · 2010
  2. Utah County v. ButlerUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Ld III, LLC v. Bbrd, LcCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2009
  4. Wasatch County v. OkelberryUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Stevens v. LaVerkin CityCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2008

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API