Legal Opinion

State v. Pinder

Utah Supreme Court

Decided March 4, 2005No. 20030484PublishedCited by 85 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURRANT, Justice:

¶ 1 John R. Pinder was convicted on eleven felony counts in connection with the murders of June Flood and Rex Tanner. Pinder appeals those convictions and claims that a new trial is warranted because (1) the State failed to satisfy its constitutional obligation to disclose exculpatory evidence to the defense, (2) the trial judge made several erroneous evi-dentiary rulings, (3) a jury instruction failed to adequately inform the jury that the State had the burden to disprove beyond a reasonable doubt the affirmative defense of compulsion, and (4) new evidence uncovered after…

2Cases cited29 opinions

  1. Brady v. MarylandSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. United States v. BagleySupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  3. United States v. AgursSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  4. Kyles v. WhitleySupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  5. Strickler v. GreeneSupreme Court of the United States · 1999

24 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by85 opinions

  1. State v. LowUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  2. State v. MaestasUtah Supreme Court · 2012
  3. State v. WinfieldUtah Supreme Court · 2006
  4. Pratt v. NelsonUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  5. Tschaggeny v. Milbank Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2007

80 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API