Legal Opinion

Miller v. USAA Casualty Insurance Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided January 11, 2002No. 20000268PublishedCited by 60 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUSSON, Associate Chief Justice.

[ 1 Plaintiffs Paul and Kathy Miller (collectively, "the Millers") appeal the denial of their motion to either set their unresolved claims for trial or provide another forum for the resolution of those claims. Additionally, the Millers appeal the district court's refusal to confirm an appraisal award in their favor. We reverse and remand.

BACKGROUND

1 2 The Millers contracted with USAA Casualty Insurance Company ("USAA") to insure their family home located in Parowan, Utah. According to section one of the written insurance contract, USAA agreed to insure the…

2Cases cited63 opinions

  1. Campbell v. HoltSupreme Court of the United States · 1885
  2. Berry by and Through Berry v. Beech AircraftUtah Supreme Court · 1985
  3. Madsen v. BorthickUtah Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Bradbury v. ValenciaUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  5. State v. BenallyNew Mexico Supreme Court · 2001

58 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by60 opinions

  1. Bailey v. BaylesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
  2. Daines v. VincentUtah Supreme Court · 2008
  3. Prince v. Bear River Mutual Insurance Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2002
  4. IHC Health Services, Inc. v. D & K MANAGEMENT, INC.Utah Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Grynberg v. Questar Pipeline Co.Utah Supreme Court · 2003

55 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API