Girod v. Kroger
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtLandau, J.
Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 21 (2012), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). We review a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those statutory requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons that follow, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.
Initiative Petition 21 would amend a number of statutory provisions pertaining to the commercial harvest and sale of salmon from the Oregon…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Puyallup Tribe v. Department of Game of Wash.Supreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Sohappy v. SmithDistrict Court, D. Oregon · 1969
- Rasmussen v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011
- Whitsett v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2010
- State v. CatholicOregon Supreme Court · 1915
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
- Girod v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2012