Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2016No. S063735Published

1Opinion of the Court

No. 33 May 26, 2016 601 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF OREGON Heather CONROY; Margaret (“Maggie”) Neel, an individual elector; Mike Forest, an individual elector; Hanna Vaandering; Trent Lutz; and Richard Schwarz, Petitioners, v. Ellen ROSENBLUM, Attorney General, State of Oregon, Respondent. (SC S063735) En Banc On petitioners’ objections to modified ballot title filed April 7, 2016; considered and under advisement on April 26, 2016. Steven C. Berman, Stoll Stoll Berne Lokting & Shlachter, P.C., Portland, filed the objections for petitioner Heather Conroy. Nathan R. Rietmann, Salem,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  5. Girod v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API