Legal Opinion

Girod v. Kroger

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided February 16, 2012No. SC S059996Published

1Opinion of the CourtBalmer, J.

Petitioners seek review of the Attorney General’s certified ballot title for Initiative Petition 26 (2012), arguing that the ballot title does not satisfy the requirements of ORS 250.035(2). We review a certified ballot title to determine whether it substantially complies with those statutory requirements. See ORS 250.085(5) (stating standard of review). For the reasons that follow, we refer the ballot title to the Attorney General for modification.

Initiative Petition 26 would amend a number of statutory provisions pertaining to the commercial harvest and sale of fish caught in Oregon waters.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pelikan v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Terhune v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  3. Girod v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API