Legal Opinion

Conroy v. Rosenblum

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided May 26, 2016No. SC S063735PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWalters, J.

This ballot title review proceeding is before us for a second time. Previously, we referred the Attorney General’s certified ballot for Initiative Petition 62 (2016) (IP 62) for modification. Conroy v. Rosenblum, 358 Or 807, 371 P3d 1180 (2016). The Attorney General has prepared and filed a modified ballot title, which two sets of petitioners now challenge. See ORS 250.085(10) (prescribing procedure for addressing objections to a modified ballot title). For the reasons that follow, we find certain of the objections to be well taken, and we refer the modified ballot title to the Attorney…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Nesbitt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2003
  2. Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Hunnicutt v. MyersOregon Supreme Court · 2007
  4. Girod v. KrogerOregon Supreme Court · 2011

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Beyer v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2018
  2. Conroy v. RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2016
  3. Parrish v. Ellen RosenblumOregon Supreme Court · 2017

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API