Carignan v. United States
District Court, D. Massachusetts
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
FRANK J. MURRAY, District Judge.
This action came on to be heard under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(e) for a determination whether judgment by default should be entered against the defendant United States and the defendants “agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation”.
On February 24,1969 papers captioned “PETITIONER’S MOTION FOR A WRIT OF REPLEVIN, TO ISSUE FOR THE RECOVERY OF HIS PERSONAL PROPERTY FROM AGENTS OF THE FEDERAL BUREAU OF INVESTIGATION” were received for filing by the clerk of this court. In accordance with the mandate of Fed.R.Civ.P. 2, these papers have been…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- Go-Bart Importing Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Crown Coat Front Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Rea v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1956
- United States v. Joseph A. Holpuch Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Keith Yazzie Mann v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Gestetner Corp. v. Case Equipment Co.District Court, D. Maine · 1985
- Phillips v. WeinerDistrict Court, D. Maine · 1984
- Milburn v. Blackfrica Promotions, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1974
- Cicchese v. Tape Time Corp.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989
- United States v. TotaroDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.