Legal Opinion
United States v. Totaro
District Court, D. Maryland
Decided March 19, 1979No. Crim. M-75-0183PublishedCited by 13 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JAMES R. MILLER, Jr., District Judge.
Defendant, Salvatore Ignatius Totaro, has filed pro se a “Motion for the Return of Illegally Seized Funds” pursuant to Rule 41(e) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Paper 54) and a “Motion for Summary or Default Judgment” on his claim for the return of the funds (Paper 55). The United States of America (USA) has filed a response to defendant’s motions in which it contends that the court should dismiss the motion for the return of seized property because it lacks subject matter jurisdiction over the claims (Paper 56).
FACTS
Defendant Totaro…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Don Morrow v. District of Columbia, in the Matter of Harry T. Alexander, Judge, District of Columbia Court of General SessionsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
- United States v. Luther R. Wilson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- United States v. Anthony P. Lafatch, and Mm CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1977
- Alfred R. Menkarell v. Bureau of NarcoticsCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1972
- United States v. Harold Wellington Rapp, Harold Wellington Rapp v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1976
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- United States v. James Leroy MartinsonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Wilson v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia Court of Appeals · 1980
- United States v. TotaroDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1979
- United States v. U. S. Currency Amounting to the Sum of $20,294.00 More or LessDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1980
- United States v. BrantDistrict Court, M.D. North Carolina · 1988
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.