Legal Opinion
City of Fresno v. Pinedale County Water District
California Court of Appeal
Decided August 21, 1986No. F005828PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
HAMLIN, Acting P.J .
Pinedale County Water District (District) appeals from a judgment permanently enjoining it from providing solid waste collection services to citizens residing both within its boundaries and those of the City of Fresno (City). The issue on appeal is one of first impression— whether City’s annexation of District’s territory terminates District’s authority to provide solid waste collection service to the annexed territory after expiration of the five-year “phase-out term” to which City consented. We will conclude that it does and affirm the judgment.
Facts
The facts are…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Bishop v. City of San JoseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1969
- Pipoly v. BensonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- Sonoma County Organization of Public Employees v. County of SonomaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Professional Fire Fighters, Inc. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- Butterworth v. BoydCalifornia Supreme Court · 1938
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Waste Resource Technologies v. DEPT. OF PUB. HLT. OF CITY AND CTY. OF SAN FRANCISCOCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
- Laidlaw Waste Systems, Inc. v. Bay Cities Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Rodeo Sanitary District v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1999
- Waste Mgmt. of Alameda Cty., Inc. v. Biagini Waste Reduction Sys., Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1998
- Home Gardens Sanitary District v. City of CoronaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2002
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.