Legal Opinion

Home Gardens Sanitary District v. City of Corona

California Court of Appeal

Decided February 11, 2002No. E029777PublishedCited by 4 opinions

[Opinion certified for partial publication.*]

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

McKINSTER, J.

A sanitary district exercises its statutory authority to construct sewers within its boundaries and to require all property owners to connect to those sewers when they need sewer service. A city then annexes part of the land within the sanitary district and imposes restrictions on the ability of property owners within the annexed portion of the district to connect to the district’s sewers. Does the district have the right to prevent the city from enforcing those restrictions? If so, does the district also have the exclusive right to provide sewer services within the common…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Birkenfeld v. City of BerkeleyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
  2. Sherwin-Williams Co. v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Committee of Seven Thousand v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Candid Enterprises, Inc. v. Grossmont Union High School DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1985
  5. IT Corp. v. Solano County Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Weiss v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2016
  2. Lateef v. City of MaderaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
  3. Opinion No. (2005), California Attorney General Reports2005
  4. Opinion No. (2010), California Attorney General Reports2010

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API