Legal Opinion
VL SYSTEMS, INC. v. Unisen, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 25, 2007No. G037334PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MOORE, J.
VL Systems, Inc. (VLS), and Star Trac Strength (Star Trac) 1 entered into a short-term computer consulting contract. The contract provided that Star Trac would not hire any VLS employee for 12 months after the contract’s termination, subject to a liquidated damages provision. Within that period, Star Trac hired a VLS employee who had not performed any work for Star Trac, and indeed, had not been employed by VLS at the time the Star Trac contract was performed. VLS sued for breach of contract, and the court awarded it part of the amount it sought under liquidated damages…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Moncharsh v. Heily & BlaseCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
- Crocker National Bank v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1989
- Diodes, Inc. v. FranzenCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1968
- Loral Corp. v. MoyesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1985
- Metro Traffic Control, Inc. v. Shadow Traffic NetworkCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1994
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Brisbane Lodging, L.P. v. Webcor Builders, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2013
- Kaufman v. GoldmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2011
- Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2015
- Silguero v. Creteguard, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 2010
- Pittsburgh Logistics Sys., Inc. v. Beemac Trucking, LLCSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.