Legal Opinion

Cypress Semiconductor Corp. v. Maxim Integrated Products, Inc.

California Court of Appeal

Decided April 28, 2015No. H038555PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

RUSHING, P. J.

-Plaintiff Cypress Semiconductor Corporation (Cypress) brought this action alleging that defendant Maxim Integrated Products, Inc. (Maxim), had misappropriated a trade secret, or was in the process of doing so, by seeking to hire away specialists in touchscreen technology, a field in which Cypress and Maxim compete. Maxim responded that it was entitled to solicit prospective employment candidates in Cypress’s workforce and that there was no evidence it had acquired, or was seeking to acquire, any trade secret. After failing to secure temporary injunctive relief, and…

2Cases cited22 opinions

  1. Denham v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Ketchum v. MosesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2001
  3. Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2010
  4. Bowers v. BernardsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1984
  5. Pepsico, Inc., a Corporation v. William E. Redmond, Jr., and the Quaker Oats Company, a CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Dunster Live, L.L.C. v. LoneStar Logos Mgmt CompanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2018
  2. Glassdoor, Inc. v. Superior Court of Santa Clara CountyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2017
  3. Conxall Corporation v. Iconn Systems, LLCAppellate Court of Illinois · 2016
  4. Cisco Systems, Inc. v. ChungDistrict Court, N.D. California · 2021
  5. Dispatch & Tracking Solutions v. City of San Diego CA4/1California Court of Appeal · 2016

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API