Silguero v. Creteguard, Inc.
California Court of Appeal
[CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*]
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MALLANO, P. J.
This case presents the question of whether a terminated employee working in the area of sales has a viable claim for wrongful termination in violation of public policy under Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co. (1980) 27 Cal.3d 167 [164 Cal.Rptr. 839, 610 P.2d 1330] (Tameny) against her subsequent employer when the employee’s former employer had contacted the employee’s subsequent employer and had informed it that the employee had signed an agreement with the former employer which prohibited the employee “from all sales activities for 18 months following either departure or…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Tameny v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court · 1980
- Schifando v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 2003
- Little v. Auto Stiegler, Inc.California Supreme Court · 2003
- Frances T. v. Village Green Owners Assn.California Supreme Court · 1986
- Edwards v. Arthur Andersen LLPCalifornia Supreme Court · 2008
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mize v. Mentor Worldwide LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2020
- Panterra GP, Inc. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2022