Legal Opinion
Langevin v. Nicolson
Court of Customs and Patent Appeals
Decided April 1, 1940No. 4208PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGareett, Presiding Judge
This is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office reversing the decision of the Examiner of Interferences in an interference proceeding originally declared January 31,1930, and redeclared in amended form July 27, 1932.
The interference involves, on the one hand, an application of Lange-vin, serial No. 390,542, filed in the United States Patent Office June 21, 1920, and, on the other, a patent, No. 1,495,429, granted Nicolson May 27, 1924, upon'an application, serial No. 227,802, filed April 10, 1918, and an application, serial No. 631,859, filed by…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Deering v. Winona Harvester WorksSupreme Court of the United States · 1894
- Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- T. H. Symington Co. v. National Malleable Castings Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1919
- Diamond Patent Co. v. S. E. Carr Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1914
- Universal Rim Co. v. Firestone Steel Products Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1923
3Cited by5 opinions
- Richard C. Price v. Dale R. SymsekCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1993
- United States v. Honorable James M. CarterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1959
- Drainage Dist. No. 4 of Dunklin County v. MurphyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1941
- Herrmann v. OtkenCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1953
- Land v. KasemannCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1947