Legal Opinion

United States v. Honorable James M. Carter

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided September 21, 1959No. 16522PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HAMLEY, Circuit Judge.

In this mandamus proceeding the United States seeks to vacate district court orders suspending the imposition of sentence and granting probation in three narcotics cases.

The Government contends that the suspension of the imposition of sentences and the granting of probation in these cases is forbidden by 26 U.S.C.A. § 7237 (d). Respondent contends that mandamus is not an available remedy, but that, if it is, such relief should nevertheless be denied as an exercise of sound discretion. Respondent further asserts that the suspension of the imposition of sentences and the…

2Cases cited13 opinions

  1. Roche v. Evaporated Milk Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1943
  2. La Buy v. Howes Leather Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1957
  3. Ex Parte CollettSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  4. Ex Parte FaheySupreme Court of the United States · 1947
  5. United States v. MurraySupreme Court of the United States · 1928

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  2. Cmax, Inc. v. HallCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1962
  3. United States v. Terry Wayne Denson, Stephen Orlando and Joseph James Janish, in Re United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  4. United States v. Richard A. TonryCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1979
  5. United States v. Helen Mae Lane, United States of America v. Honorable Fred KunzelCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API