Legal Opinion
Universal Rim Co. v. Firestone Steel Products Co.
District Court, N.D. Ohio
Decided March 29, 1923No. 757PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WESTENHAVER, District Judge.
This is the usual patent infringement suit, with the usual defenses of invalidity and noninfringement. It is based bn United States letters patent No. 1,095,775, issued to plaintiff as assignee of Erie K. Baker, May 5, .1914, on application filed June 13, 1910. Claims 1, 2, 6, and 9 only are in issue. The patented device purports to be for an improvement in demountable tire-carrying rims, of the kind which are somewhat larger than the automobile wheels on which they are designed to be used, and which are secured to the wheels by means of clamps or wedge lugs.…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- The Barbed Wire PatentSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Railway Co. v. SaylesSupreme Court of the United States · 1878
- Adams Electric Ry. Co. v. Lindell Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1896
- Republic Iron & Steel Co. v. Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1921
- Columbus Chain Co. v. Standard Chain Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1906
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Julius Levine & Co. v. Automatic Paper Machinery Co.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1933
- Union Trust Co. v. White Motor Co.District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1927
- Langevin v. NicolsonCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1940