Legal Opinion
Drainage Dist. No. 4 of Dunklin County v. Murphy
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided April 15, 1941No. 11736PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
STONE, Circuit Judge.
Appellee is holder of bonds issued by the Drainage District. Appellants are the District, the County of Dunklin (Missouri), and the Judges of the County Court — the Judges of the County Court being the governing body of the District under State statutes. In November, 1936, appellee secured a judgment, in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri, against appellants for the amounts due on the bonds — such payment to be from “funds raised or to be raised by benefit assessments upon and against the land” in the District. Being unsuccessful in…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Maryland v. Soper, JudgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1926
- Ex Parte Skinner & Eddy Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Duncan Townsite Co. v. LaneSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Greathouse v. DernSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- O'BRIEN v. WheelockSupreme Court of the United States · 1902
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Heller v. PlaveDistrict Court, S.D. Florida · 1990
- Laycock v. Hidalgo County Water Control & Improvement Dist. No. 12Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1944
- García Río v. Vivas MoralesSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1947
- State Ex Rel. McGee v. WilsonSupreme Court of Missouri · 1949
- McFaw Land Co. v. Kansas City Title & Trust Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1948
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.