DeParrie v. State
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, P. J.
These are appeals by the plaintiffs in two consolidated declaratory judgment actions that were brought, respectively, by plaintiff deParrie and by plaintiffs Mabon, Neet, Graham and No Special Rights Committee, PAC. In both actions, the plaintiffs sought a declaration that ORS 659.165 is invalid. That statute provides:
“ (1) A political subdivision of the state may not enact or enforce any charter provision, ordinance, resolution or policy granting special rights, privileges or treatment to any citizen or group of citizens on account of sexual orientation, or enact or enforce any charter…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- City of La Grande v. Public Employes Retirement BoardOregon Supreme Court · 1978
- Eckles v. State of OregonOregon Supreme Court · 1988
- City of Roseburg v. Roseburg City Firefighters, Local No. 1489Oregon Supreme Court · 1981
- Webb v. Clatsop County School District No. 3Oregon Supreme Court · 1950
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- Sims v. Besaw's CaféCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Oregon Restaurant Ass'n v. City of CorvallisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- Barton v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.