Legal Opinion
Barton v. City of Lebanon
Court of Appeals of Oregon
Decided April 21, 2004No. 2003-003, 2003-004, 2003-005; A122550PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDeits, C. J.
Petitioners, Blake Barton and Friends of Linn County, seek review of a Land Use Board of Appeals (LUBA) order affirming three decisions by the City of Lebanon (the city). Barton v. City of Lebanon, 45 Or LUBA 214 (2003). Those decisions collectively facilitate the siting of a Wal-Mart Superstore. In its first decision, the city amended its comprehensive plan map to change the subject property’s land use designation from Mixed Density Residential to “SPD.” The amendment of the plan map facilitates commercial development on the subject property. The second of the three decisions annexes a…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Utsey v. Coos CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2001
- Local No. 290 v. Oregon Department of Environmental QualityOregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Thunderbird Motel, Inc. v. City of PortlandCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Just v. City of LebanonCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2004
- DeParrie v. StateCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1995
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- WaterWatch of Oregon, Inc. v. Water Resources CommissionCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Flying J, Inc. v. Marion CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Knutson Family LLC v. City of EugeneCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005
- Friends of the Metolius v. Jefferson CountyCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2005