Legal Opinion

Quint v. Hoffman

California Supreme Court

Decided August 8, 1894No. 18306PublishedCited by 25 opinions

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Glenn County dissolving an injunction. The facts are stated in the opinion of the court.

1Opinion of the CourtGaroutte, J.

This is an action commenced by the plaintiff to enjoin the defendant, P. H. Graham, as collector of Central Irrigation District, from selling any lands of the plaintiff, and of others similarly situated, for assessments levied in the year 1892. A temporary injunction was issued upon the filing of the complaint, which was subsequently dissolved upon the ground that the facts stated therein were not sufficient to entitle the plaintiff to the relief demanded, and thereupon this appeal was taken from such order of dissolution.

The only question presented by this appeal is, Does the complaint state…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Dean v. DavisCalifornia Supreme Court · 1876
  2. San Jose Gas Co. v. JanuaryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Esterbrook v. O'BrienCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893
  4. Swamp Land District No. 150 v. A.J.California Supreme Court · 1893
  5. People v. Selma Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1893

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by25 opinions

  1. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905
  2. Keech v. JoplinCalifornia Supreme Court · 1909
  3. Taylor v. ColeCalifornia Supreme Court · 1927
  4. People v. Linda Vista Irrigation DistrictCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Reclamation District No. 70 v. ShermanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1909

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API