Legal Opinion

Stege v. City of Richmond

California Supreme Court

Decided August 12, 1924No. S. F. No. 10503PublishedCited by 26 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtShenk, J.

This is an action to quiet title. From a judgment in favor of the defendants the plaintiffs appeal. The appellants are the owners of certain lots in the city of Richmond. The respondents claim am interest in said lots by reason' of certain assessments for street improvements. On the twenty-first day of August, 1916, the council of the city of Richmond adopted a resolution, number 281-2, declaring its intention to grade, curb, sidewalk, and pave certain portions of 47th Street in said city. The proceedings were taken under the Improvement Act of 1911 (Stats. 1911, p. 730) and amendments…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Civic Center Ass'n of Los Angeles v. Railroad CommissionCalifornia Supreme Court · 1917
  2. Fragley v. PhelanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Holland v. HotchkissCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Byrne v. DrainCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Couts v. CornellCalifornia Supreme Court · 1905

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by26 opinions

  1. West Coast Advertising Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  2. Mallon v. City of Long BeachCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
  3. American Co. v. City of LakeportCalifornia Supreme Court · 1934
  4. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co. v. City & County of San FranciscoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1959
  5. Wise v. First National BankArizona Supreme Court · 1937

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API