Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Newkirk

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 24, 2005PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 31, 2003, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because her employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a word processor for the New York City Transit Authority. She was paid on an hourly basis and was required to keep a record of the hours she worked. Her employment was terminated after it was discovered that she had falsified her time records. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board disqualified her from receiving unemployment insurance…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of Du BoisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  2. In re the Claim of ThomasAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  3. In re the Claim of KellyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  4. In re the Claim of ChangAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of MarioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  2. In re the Claim of GarciaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
  3. In re the Claim of BecotteAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API