Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of Becotte

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 19, 2007PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed February 27, 2006, which ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because his employment was terminated due to misconduct.

Claimant worked as a service writer for a motorcycle repair shop for nearly 21h years. After the employer discovered that claimant had been changing the initials of his coworkers on computerized work orders for the purpose of obtaining the commissions, his employment was terminated. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that claimant was disqualified…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of RaduAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
  2. In re the Claim of MarioneAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. In re the Claim of FeliceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  4. In re the Claim of NewkirkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of LoRussoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  2. In re the Claim of BolickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  3. In re the Claim of BolickAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API