Legal Opinion

Gate City Lumber Co. v. City of Montesano

Washington Supreme Court

Decided November 25, 1910No. 9181PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for Chehalis county, Irwin, J., entered April 18, 1910, upon findings in favor of the plaintiff, in an action to recover for materials furnished to.a city contractor.

1Opinion of the CourtRudkin, C. J.

On the 3d day of August, 1908, the defendant city entered into a contract with the defendant Montesano Planing Mill Co., wherein the latter agreed to replanlc a certain elevated roadway for the city, at the agreed price of $14.50 per thousand for all lumber used in the performance of the work. Between the 24th day of August and the 25th day of September, 1909, the plaintiff sold and delivered to the contractor three car loads of lumber, to be used in the performance of its contract, at the agreed price of $642.76. The city failed to require the contractor to enter into a bond, conditioned…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Foster v. DohleNebraska Supreme Court · 1885
  2. W. P. Fuller & Co. v. RyanWashington Supreme Court · 1906
  3. A. H. Weir & Co. v. BarnesNebraska Supreme Court · 1894

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Gary Hay Grain Co., Inc. v. CarlsonMontana Supreme Court · 1927
  4. United States Rubber Co. of California v. American Bonding Co. of BaltimoreWashington Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API