Legal Opinion
Gary Hay Grain Co., Inc. v. Carlson
Montana Supreme Court
Decided April 13, 1927No. 6,058, No. 6,085PublishedCited by 36 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJustice Matthews
Appeal by the Fidelity & Deposit Company from a judgment against it and in favor of plaintiff, and appeal by the bank from a judgment against it and in favor of the Fidelity & Deposit Company.
In September, 1922, Albert Carlson entered into a contract with the state highway commission for the construction of approximately three miles of road in Park county, a part of a federal aid project, which contract required him to furnish all equipment, labor and material for the prosecution of the work. As a condition precedent to the complete execution of the contract, Carlson was required to furnish a…
2Cases cited65 opinions
- Illinois Surety Co. v. John Davis Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1917
- United States Ex Rel. Hill v. American Surety Co. of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1906
- Guaranty Co. v. Pressed Brick Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Illinois Surety Co. v. United States Ex Rel. PeelerSupreme Court of the United States · 1916
- Brogan v. National Surety Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1918
60 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by36 opinions
- Federal Surety Co. v. Basin Construction Co.Montana Supreme Court · 1931
- Smith Engineering Co. v. RiceCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1938
- Bower v. TebbsMontana Supreme Court · 1957
- Fidelity & Deposit Co. v. Mattingly Lumber Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1939
- Denton v. DetweilerIdaho Supreme Court · 1929
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.