W. P. Fuller & Co. v. Ryan
Washington Supreme Court
Appeal from a judgment of the superior court for King county, Frater, J., entered December 11, 1905, upon findings in favor of the defendants, after a trial on the merits before the court without a jury, in an action to foreclose a mechanics5 lien.
1Opinion of the CourtRoot, J.
This was an action commenced by .appellant, a' wholesale paint firm of Seattle, to foreclose a lien for painting materials furnished for use on a building erected by respondents Ryan and wife. Findings of fact and conclusions of law were entered favorable to defendants. From a judgment and decree thereupon, this appeal is prosecuted.-
*386Exceptions are taken to several findings of fact, and the making thereof is assigned as error. We think the findings complained of are sustained by the evidence; at least, all those that are material to a decision of the case, in the light of the conclusion which…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Chapin v. Persse & Brooks Paper WorksSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1862
- Silvester v. Coe Quartz Mine Co.California Supreme Court · 1889
- Washington Iron Works Co. v. JensenWashington Supreme Court · 1892
- Hunter v. BlanchardIllinois Supreme Court · 1857
- Hill v. BowersSupreme Court of Kansas · 1891
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- National Surety Co. v. Bratnober Lumber Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
- Puget Sound State Bank v. GallucciWashington Supreme Court · 1914
- Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
- Pittsburg Plate Grass Co. v. LearySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1910
- Gate City Lumber Co. v. City of MontesanoWashington Supreme Court · 1910
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.