Blanas v. Brower Co.
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
EASTAUGH, Justice.
I. INTRODUCTION
Hany Blanas entered into a compromise and release (C & R) with his employer and its insurer to resolve his workers’ compensation claim. Sixteen months later he asked the Alaska Workers’ Compensation Board to reopen his claim and modify the C & R, in part because he claimed representatives of the employer’s insurer had fraudulently induced him to settle and sign the C&R. The Board denied his request, and the superior court affirmed. Blanas now appeals to this court. We reverse.
II. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS
While employed by the Brower Company in 1990, Blanas…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Adamson v. University of AlaskaAlaska Supreme Court · 1991
- Handley v. State, Department of RevenueAlaska Supreme Court · 1992
- Jager v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- Greater Anchorage Area Borough v. City of AnchorageAlaska Supreme Court · 1972
- Estelle v. Board of Education of Borough of Red BankSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1954
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Alaska Public Interest Research Group v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 2007
- Williams v. AboodAlaska Supreme Court · 2002
- Leigh v. Seekins FordAlaska Supreme Court · 2006
- Monzulla v. Voorhees Concrete CuttingAlaska Supreme Court · 2011
- Raad v. Alaska State Commission for Human RightsAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.