Legal Opinion

State ex rel. Breno v. Industrial Commission

Ohio Supreme Court

Decided June 20, 1973No. 73-64PublishedCited by 20 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCorrigan, J.

Appellant, in his proposition of law, contends that:

*229“Where all three physicians, who examined the claimant, agree that he needed additional treatment of his injury, and differ only as to the kind of treatment recommended, the choice among the several recommendations is reserved to the claimant under Section 4123.651 ORC, and it is an abuse of discretion for the Industrial Commission to refuse to order a self-insured employer to pay for the treatment.”

The application of R. C- 4123.651 was before this court in State, ex rel. Campbell, v. Indus. Comm. (1971), 28 Ohio St. 2d 154. After…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. State, Ex Rel. v. Indus. Comm.Ohio Supreme Court · 1933
  2. State ex rel. Campbell v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1971
  3. State Ex Rel. Bevis v. CoffinberryOhio Supreme Court · 1949
  4. State ex rel. Marshall v. KellerOhio Supreme Court · 1968
  5. State ex rel. Szekely v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1968

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. State ex rel. General Motors Corp. v. Industrial CommissionOhio Supreme Court · 1975
  2. State ex rel. Glass, Molders, Pottery, Plastics & Allied Workers International Union, Local 333 v. State Employment Relations BoardOhio Supreme Court · 1993
  3. Northwestern Ohio Bldg. & Constr. Trades Council v. ConradOhio Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Carney v. School Employees Retirement System BoardOhio Court of Appeals · 1987
  5. City of Seven Hills v. City of ClevelandOhio Court of Appeals · 1980

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API