Legal Opinion
Hollmer v. Harari
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided June 7, 2012No. 2011-1276PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
This case is a second appeal from the United States Patent and Trademark Office, Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences (“Board”) involving Patent Interference No. 105,606(JL) between Eliyahou Harari and Sanjay Mehrotra (collectively “Harari”), named inventors on pending U.S. Patent Application No. 09/310,880 (“'880 application”), and Shane C. Hollmer and Lee E. Cleveland (collectively “Hollmer”), named inventors on U.S. Patent No. 5,828,601 (“'601 patent”). The Board entered judgment against Hollmer after finding that Harari’s '880 application was entitled to the…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Lebron v. National Railroad Passenger CorporationSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
- Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Gary W. BooneCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Falko-Gunter Falkner, Georg Holzer, and Friedrich Dorner v. Stephen C. Inglis, Michael E.G. Boursnell, and Anthony C. MinsonCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- In re HoganCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1977
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Lifestyle Enterprise, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Suffolk Technologies, LLC v. Aol Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Droplets, Inc. v. Etrade BankCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Sprint Communications Co. L.P. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2017
- Akeva L.L.C. v. Nike, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.