Legal Opinion
Suffolk Technologies, LLC v. Aol Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided May 27, 2014No. 2013-1392PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PROST, Circuit Judge.
Suffolk Technologies, LLC (“Suffolk”) appeals from the summary judgment of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia holding certain claims of Suffolk’s U.S. Patent No. 6,081,835 (“'835 patent”) invalid. Specifically, the district court held that claims 1, 7, and 9 were anticipated by a Usenet newsgroup post. Suffolk then stipulated that, in light of the district court’s prior art, claim construction, and expert testimony rulings, claim 6 was also anticipated. Upon entry of final judgment, Suffolk appealed.
We conclude that the district court…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Southern States Rack and Fixture, Incorporated v. Sherwin-Williams Company, and Keller Rigging & Construction Sc, IncorporatedCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2003
- Constant v. Advanced Micro-Devices, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Medtronic, Inc. v. BarryCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Jazz Pharmaceuticals, Inc. v. Amneal Pharmaceuticals, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2018
- Canvs Corporation v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- CAO Lighting, Inc. v. Light Efficient DesignDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Centripetal Networks, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2021
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.