Legal Opinion
Sprint Communications Co. L.P. v. Time Warner Cable, Inc.
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided May 30, 2017No. Case No. 11-2686-JWLPublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
John W. Lungstrum, United States District Judge
This patent infringement case was tried to a jury in this Court from February 13, 2017, through March 3, 2017. By its verdict, the jury found the following: that Time Warner Cable1 infringed each of the *1138asserted claims of the five Sprint patents at issue;, that none of those claims is invalid; that Sprint proved reasonable, royalty damages in the amount of $139,800,000; and that Time Warner Cable’s infringement was willful. By Memorandum and Order of March 14, 2017, the Court issued findings of fact and conclusions of law, by…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Microsoft Corp. v. i4i Ltd. PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 2011
- General Motors Corp. v. Devex Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- I4i Ltd. Partnership v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Gorenstein Enterprises, Inc., Sam Gorenstein, and David Gorenstein v. Quality Care-Usa, Inc. And David A. ScheinmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1989
- Sims v. Great American Life InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2006
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Belden Canada ULC v. CommScope, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2025
- Sprint Communications Company L.P. v. Charter Communications, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 2021