Legal Opinion
Gilbert P. Hyatt v. Gary W. Boone
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided August 26, 1998No. 96-1514, 96-1515PublishedCited by 70 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PAULINE NEWMAN, Circuit Judge.
The parties to Patent Interference No. 102,598 are Gilbert P. Hyatt, inventor of United States Patent No. 4,942,516 entitled “Single Chip Integrated Circuit Computer Architecture” (the ’516 patent), and Gary W. Boone, inventor of patent application Serial No. 07/473,541 entitled “Variable Function Programmed Systems” (the ’541 application). Mr. Hyatt appeals the decision of the Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences, entering judgment against him and cancelling the relevant claims of his ’516 patent. Mr. Boone cross-appeals the Board’s entry of judgment…
2Cases cited30 opinions
- Vermont Yankee Nuclear Power Corp. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Davis v. WakeleeSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
- Hybritech Incorporated v. Monoclonal Antibodies, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1986
- Vas-Cath Incorporated and Gambro, Inc. v. Sakharam D. Mahurkar, and Quinton Instruments CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Lawrence B. Lockwood v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1997
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by70 opinions
- Rexnord Corporation v. The Laitram Corporation and Intralox, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2001
- Franchise Tax Bd. of Cal. v. HyattSupreme Court of the United States · 2019
- Dr. Raymond G. Tronzo v. Biomet, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
- Katz v. American Airlines, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
- University of Rochester v. G.D. Searle & Co., Inc., Monsanto Company, Pharmacia Corporation, and Pfizer Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
65 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.