Legal Opinion

City of Phoenix v. Superior Court

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided January 8, 1996No. 1-CA-SA 95-0256PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

LANKFORD, Judge.

This is a special action from a decision of the superior court granting relief in a special action. By order, we previously accepted jurisdiction and granted relief. This opinion explains the reasons for our order.

This case concerns the qualifications of a contractor to bid on a City of Phoenix construction project. The issue is whether the contractor was qualified to bid when it held only a Class A contractor’s license at the time it bid, and it obtained the required Class B license after it submitted a bid but before the contract was awarded. Resolution of this issue…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  2. City of Phoenix v. SUPERIOR COURT, CTY. OF MARICOPAArizona Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Urbatec, a California Corporation v. Yuma County, an Arizona CountyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Smith v. PinnamaneniCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  2. State v. WilkinsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000
  3. Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El DestinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
  4. Arizona Commercial Diving Services, Inc. v. Applied Diving Services, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2006
  5. Twin Peaks Construction Inc. v. Weatherguard Metal Construction, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2007

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API