State v. Wilkinson
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
FIDEL, Judge.
¶ 1 It is a class one misdemeanor in Arizona to act as a residential contractor without a license. See A.R.S. § 32-1151 (1996). This special action presents the question whether an unlicensed contractor convicted of that crime may be required, by order of restitution, to reimburse a contracting homeowner for the economic damages that the homeowner suffered from the contractor’s incomplete ánd faulty work.
I. History
¶ 2 In February 1996, Defendant John R. Porter represented himself as a licensed con*378tractor to homeowner T.S.; the following month he did so to homeowner N.L.…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- People v. MilneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
- Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
- State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
- State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State Ex Rel. Romley v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- State v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
- State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
- Town of Gilbert Prosecutor's Office v. DownieArizona Supreme Court · 2008
- Gilbert Prosecutor v. Hon. downie/matykiewiczArizona Supreme Court · 2008
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.