Legal Opinion

State v. Wilkinson

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided September 13, 2000No. 1 CA-SA 00-0054PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

FIDEL, Judge.

¶ 1 It is a class one misdemeanor in Arizona to act as a residential contractor without a license. See A.R.S. § 32-1151 (1996). This special action presents the question whether an unlicensed contractor convicted of that crime may be required, by order of restitution, to reimburse a contracting homeowner for the economic damages that the homeowner suffered from the contractor’s incomplete ánd faulty work.

I. History

¶ 2 In February 1996, Defendant John R. Porter represented himself as a licensed con*378tractor to homeowner T.S.; the following month he did so to homeowner N.L.…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. People v. MilneSupreme Court of Colorado · 1984
  2. Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  3. State v. FancherCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1991
  4. State Ex Rel. McDougall v. Superior CourtCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1996
  5. State v. RodgersCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Romley v. FieldsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  2. State v. WilkinsonArizona Supreme Court · 2002
  3. State Ex Rel. Pennartz v. OlcavageCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2001
  4. Town of Gilbert Prosecutor's Office v. DownieArizona Supreme Court · 2008
  5. Gilbert Prosecutor v. Hon. downie/matykiewiczArizona Supreme Court · 2008

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API