Legal Opinion

Twin Peaks Construction Inc. v. Weatherguard Metal Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided February 27, 2007No. 2 CA-CV 2006-0095PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ESPINOSA, Judge.

¶ 1 Twin Peaks Construction Inc. of Nevada appeals from the superior court’s ruling affirming the order of the Arizona Registrar of Contractors requiring Twin Peaks to comply with A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(ll) by paying its subcontractor, appellee Weatherguard Metal Construction, Inc., amounts owed and also awarding Weatherguard its attorney fees. Twin Peaks argues a conflict exists between A.R.S. § 32-1153 and A.R.S. § 32-1154, and both the Registrar and the superi- or court incorrectly interpreted § 32-1153 to preclude Twin Peaks’s asserted defense based on that statute.…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
  4. Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
  5. Hunter Contracting Co. v. Sanner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bentley v. Building Our FutureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
  2. Nick Hardy v. NybergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API