Twin Peaks Construction Inc. v. Weatherguard Metal Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
ESPINOSA, Judge.
¶ 1 Twin Peaks Construction Inc. of Nevada appeals from the superior court’s ruling affirming the order of the Arizona Registrar of Contractors requiring Twin Peaks to comply with A.R.S. § 32-1154(A)(ll) by paying its subcontractor, appellee Weatherguard Metal Construction, Inc., amounts owed and also awarding Weatherguard its attorney fees. Twin Peaks argues a conflict exists between A.R.S. § 32-1153 and A.R.S. § 32-1154, and both the Registrar and the superi- or court incorrectly interpreted § 32-1153 to preclude Twin Peaks’s asserted defense based on that statute.…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- City of Mesa v. KillingsworthArizona Supreme Court · 1964
- Ruiz v. HullArizona Supreme Court · 1998
- Unum Life Insurance Co. of America v. CraigArizona Supreme Court · 2001
- Aesthetic Property Maintenance, Inc. v. Capitol Indemnity Corp.Arizona Supreme Court · 1995
- Hunter Contracting Co. v. Sanner Contracting Co.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 1972
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Bentley v. Building Our FutureCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2007
- Nick Hardy v. NybergCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016