Smith v. Pinnamaneni
Court of Appeals of Arizona
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
NORRIS, Judge.
¶ 1 This appeal arises out of an arbitration award in favor of a contractor, plaintiff/appel-lee W Inc. We hold the superior court properly confirmed the award against defendant/appellant Pioneer Family Investments, LLC, because Pioneer waived its defense that W Inc. was an unlicensed contractor by failing to raise it in the arbitration. Because the superior court, however, did not determine whether defendant/appellant Krishna Pinnamaneni, a nonparty to the construction contract between W Inc. and Pioneer, was bound to arbitrate, we reverse confirmation of the award…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
- Sphere Drake Insurance Limited, Formerly Known as Odyssey Re (London) Limited v. All American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
- Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
- Lee v. ING Investment Management, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
- R4 Constructors v. Inbalance YogaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
- Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El DestinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.