Legal Opinion

Smith v. Pinnamaneni

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided April 28, 2011No. 1 CA-CV 10-0329PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NORRIS, Judge.

¶ 1 This appeal arises out of an arbitration award in favor of a contractor, plaintiff/appel-lee W Inc. We hold the superior court properly confirmed the award against defendant/appellant Pioneer Family Investments, LLC, because Pioneer waived its defense that W Inc. was an unlicensed contractor by failing to raise it in the arbitration. Because the superior court, however, did not determine whether defendant/appellant Krishna Pinnamaneni, a nonparty to the construction contract between W Inc. and Pioneer, was bound to arbitrate, we reverse confirmation of the award…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. First Options of Chicago, Inc. v. KaplanSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
  2. In Re Labatt Food Service, L.P.Texas Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Sphere Drake Insurance Limited, Formerly Known as Odyssey Re (London) Limited v. All American Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
  4. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Davidson v. HensenWashington Supreme Court · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Dueñas v. Life Care Centers of America, Inc.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  2. The ESTATE OF JOSEFA U. DeCAMACHO v. LA SOLANA CARE AND REHAB, INC.Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014
  3. Lee v. ING Investment Management, LLCCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2016
  4. R4 Constructors v. Inbalance YogaCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2020
  5. Wb, the Building Company, LLC. v. El DestinoCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2011

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API