Legal Opinion
Extreme Coatings, Inc. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided February 26, 2013No. 12-516 CPublishedCited by 17 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Contract Dispute; RCFC 12(b)(6); Elements of a Differing Site Conditions Claim; “Act of God” Weather Conditions.
OPINION AND ORDER
BUSH, Judge.
The court has before it defendant’s motion for partial dismissal, brought under Rule 12(b)(6) of the Rules of the United States *452Court of Federal Claims (RCFC). The motion challenges Counts I-V, and a portion of Count IX, of the complaint. Def.’s Mot. at 1. Plaintiffs suit is a not atypical contractor claim for monetary relief brought under the Contract Disputes Act of 1978, 41 U.S.C.A. §§ 7101-7109 (West 2011) (CDA). Compl. ¶ 3. Defendant’s motion is not…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Ashcroft v. IqbalSupreme Court of the United States · 2009
- Bell Atlantic Corp. v. TwomblySupreme Court of the United States · 2007
- Harlow v. FitzgeraldSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Scheuer v. RhodesSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Papasan v. AllainSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Marchena v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2016
- Moda Health Plan, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Dennis J. Quebedeaux, on Behalf of Himself and All Other Similarly Situated Persons and Entities v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
- Molina Healthcare of California, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2017
- Kenneth Earman v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2013
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.