Legal Opinion

Johnson v. Watson

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1954No. 3795PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, C. J. :

This case concerns the sufficiency under the statute of frauds of a written memorandum- of agreement. Appellants, as plaintiffs, brought suit for damages against defendants, now respondents, alleging breach of an oral agreement to purchase improved real property and furnishings therein. A written memorandum of the agreement was attached to the complaint. Defendants challenged the sufficiency of the memorandum by moving to dismiss the complaint. This motion was granted, and plaintiffs appealed.

Two primary objections to the sufficiency of the memorandum are…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Martin v. SeigelWashington Supreme Court · 1949
  2. Tobin v. LarkinMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1903
  3. Stanley v. A. Levy & J. Zentner Co.Nevada Supreme Court · 1941
  4. Roberts v. HummelNevada Supreme Court · 1952
  5. Montgomery v. GravesCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1945

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Haspray v. PasarelliNevada Supreme Court · 1963
  2. Ray Motor Lodge, Inc. v. ShatzNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  3. Wiley v. CookNevada Supreme Court · 1978
  4. Georgiou Studio, Inc. v. Boulevard Invest, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
  5. Haspray v. PasarelliNevada Supreme Court · 1963

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API