Ray Motor Lodge, Inc. v. Shatz
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Thompson, J.:
The appeal is from a judgment directing Ray Motor Lodge, Inc. and Rice to specifically perform their agreement to sell certain real property to Shatz. The appellants (sellers) seek a reversal on two grounds. First, they assert that the record shows no more than preliminary negotiations for a sale rather than an enforeible contract; second, that the requirements of NRS 111.210(1) were not met. We find no merit in either of these contentions, and affirm the judgment entered.
The first ground for reversal (that the record shows no more than preliminary…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Roberts v. HummelNevada Supreme Court · 1952
- Chisholm v. RedfieldNevada Supreme Court · 1959
- Coray v. HomNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Haspray v. PasarelliNevada Supreme Court · 1963
- Bowker v. GoodwinNevada Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Johnson v. AuranNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1974
- Edwards Industries, Inc. v. DTE/BTE, Inc.Nevada Supreme Court · 1996
- Hanneman v. DownerNevada Supreme Court · 1994
- Fox v. First Western Savings & Loan Ass'nNevada Supreme Court · 1970
- Georgiou Studio, Inc. v. Boulevard Invest, LLCDistrict Court, D. Nevada · 2009
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.