Roberts v. Hummel
Nevada Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
By the Court,
Eather, J.:
Appellant secured a written option to buy from respondents, Fred C. Hummel and Pearl S. Hummel, his wife, a ranch property in Nevada with personalty thereon. When he attempted to exercise the option, the Hummels declined to convey and he filed in the court below a complaint for specific performance. Later he amended the complaint to include Leslie McKernan and Laura F. McKernan, his wife, as parties defendant because they had alleged some rights in at least part of the property covered by the option. On demurrer, the court below declined to decree specific…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
- Baucum v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- Koch v. StreuterIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
- Dougherty v. ChesnuttTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
- Hollis v. BurgessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1974
- Curran v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
- City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Civic Developments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
- Ray Motor Lodge, Inc. v. ShatzNevada Supreme Court · 1964
- Seyden v. FradeNevada Supreme Court · 1972
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.