Legal Opinion

Roberts v. Hummel

Nevada Supreme Court

Decided April 29, 1952No. 3689PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

By the Court,

Eather, J.:

Appellant secured a written option to buy from respondents, Fred C. Hummel and Pearl S. Hummel, his wife, a ranch property in Nevada with personalty thereon. When he attempted to exercise the option, the Hummels declined to convey and he filed in the court below a complaint for specific performance. Later he amended the complaint to include Leslie McKernan and Laura F. McKernan, his wife, as parties defendant because they had alleged some rights in at least part of the property covered by the option. On demurrer, the court below declined to decree specific…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Allen v. KitchenIdaho Supreme Court · 1909
  2. Baucum v. GeorgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
  3. Koch v. StreuterIllinois Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Dougherty v. ChesnuttTennessee Supreme Court · 1887
  5. Hollis v. BurgessSupreme Court of Kansas · 1887

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. First Security Bank of Utah, N.A. v. WrightUtah Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Curran v. BarefootCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2007
  3. City of Milwaukee v. Milwaukee Civic Developments, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1976
  4. Ray Motor Lodge, Inc. v. ShatzNevada Supreme Court · 1964
  5. Seyden v. FradeNevada Supreme Court · 1972

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API